Computrainer classic software#

Even geekier, you can use mapping software to input any road with elevation info, even my local races, into the system. More important, and cooler, it can accept digital maps of real bike routes like the Ironman Kona and simulate elevation changes up to a 15% grade by making pedaling harder. It can act as a graphical biofeedback device that cues you into the impact smoothing your pedal stroke and making small fit adjustments can have to your power output. The CompuTrainer hardware and software does some neat things it monitors speed, distance, cadence, power output and heart rate in a graphical format that keeps the 'ride' interesting. So inevitably I spend a lot of hours in the garage, on the CompuTrainer, riding my beloved the Cervelo Team Soloist. I also live in an area where traffic doesn't make it easy to get in a long uninterrupted ride safely and effectively. The problem is that most weekdays, I leave home early and get home late, so my key training hours are in the dark. You are on the bike for most of a race, so the majority of your training time is spent there, too.

It's a great fitness activity and stress reliever, but it's hard to balance the schedule of a CIO with the training hours needed for all three sports. My theory is that this will help overcome the inability of Zwift to assess drag without an accurate power meter and improve the accuracy of the FTP test.I started doing triathlons (swimming, biking, running) last year. I used this resistance to do the FTP test on Zwift. I then set the resistance to the level that I know I would allow me to maintain the speed that I average when on the road. I did this by testing it on a 0 grade part of the course and maintaining 90 rpm using the Wahoo speed and cadence sensors. That said I can control resistance and the first thing I did was to estimate the appropriate resistance setting I needed to duplicate road resistance. Unfortunately, I canвЂ™t sync it with Zwift due to mechanical problems with my controller. I would completely agree with you that the Zwift estimation is not accurate but on a day to day basis it is consistent and will help you gauge progress. Those who can afford power meters and the many who are just getting into the sport. Hopefully Zwift will be able to use this data along with data posted by other users to help them improve the accuracy of their software for all riders. I really enjoy Zwift and would encourage anyone to hop on the platform, with or without a power meter. However, once it passes about 540 watts the pendulum swings the other way and then it begins to underestimate power by well over 22%. In the lower power range zwift overestimates power by more than 30%. ItвЂ™s pretty clear that ZwiftвЂ™s estimates are off. Power was recorded from the Assioma Duo pedals and ZwiftвЂ™sВ estimate. Speed was recorded using the Garmin 520 computer. Here are the results.ДЄll tests were done on the CycleOps Magneto trainer. Still unsatisfied, I got my hands on some Favero Assioma dual pedal based power meters, and did some real tests. So I did the best I could to compare ZwiftвЂ™s power to CycleOps power graph, which I wrote about. but I had no way of knowing if my power was accurate. I enjoy the challenge of competing with other riders any day of the week. I believe one had to complete 2 races along with some group rides and their training workouts to graduate. Less than one week in and I find out that the Zwift Academy has started. Because I know the speed IвЂ™m pedalling, and since the resistance of the trainer is consistent, I can tell very easily if IвЂ™m improving.

I use a classic magneto trainer with a Garmin speed, heart rate and cadence sensor, which do the trick for me. In a way, it is my winter group ride replacement. I began using Zwift late last year for offseason riding.

Computrainer classic